Page 247 - Linear Models for the Prediction of Animal Breeding Values 3rd Edition
P. 247

Section 13.2.2, the data for calving difficulty could be represented in an  s by
        2 contingency table:
                                           Response category
                          Row         Easy calving  Difficult calving

                          1               n            n  − n
                                           11           1.  11
                          2               n            n  − n
                                           21           2.  21

                          j               n            n  − n
                                           j1           j.  j1

                          s               n            n  − n
                                           s1           s.  s1
        where the s rows refer to conditions affecting an individual or grouped records. Note
        that n  or n  − n  in the above table can be null, as responses in the two categories
              i1   i.  i1
        are mutually exclusive, but n ¹ 0.
                                 i
            Assume that a normal function has been used to describe the probability of
        response for calving ease. Let y  be the vector for observations for the quantitative
                                    1
        trait, such as birth weight, and y  be the vector of the underlying variable for calving
                                    2
        difficulty. The model for trait 1 would be:
            y  = X b  + Z u  + e                                           (13.13)
             1    1 1   1 1   1
        and for the underlying variable for trait 2:

            y  = X b  + Z u  + e                                           (13.14)
             2    2 2   2 2   2
        where b  and u  are vectors of fixed effect and sire solutions for trait 1, and X  and
               1      1                                                      1
        Z  are the usual incidence matrices. The matrices X  and Z  are incidence matrices
          1                                           2      2
        for the liability. The matrix Z  = Z  and X  = X H, where H is an identity matrix if
                                  2    1      2   1
        all factors affecting the quantitative traits also affect the liability. However, if certain
        fixed effects affecting the quantitative trait have no effect on the liability,  H is
        obtained by deleting the columns of an identity matrix of appropriate order corre-
        sponding to such effects. It is assumed that:
                e ⎛  1 ⎞  ⎛ R 11  R 12 ⎞
            var ⎜ e ⎝  2 ⎟ ⎠  =  ⎜ ⎝ R 21  R ⎠ ⎟
                               22
               ⎛ u 1 ⎞
            var ⎜ ⎝ u ⎠ ⎟  = A ⊗  G                                        (13.15)
                 2
        where G is the genetic covariance matrix for both traits and A is the numerator rela-
        tionship matrix.
            Let q′ = [b , t, u , n], the vector of location parameters in Eqns 13.13 and 13.14 to be
                    1    1
        estimated, where t = b  − bHb  and n = u  − bu , where b is the residual regression coeffi-
                           2     1        2    1
        cient of the underlying variate on the quantitative trait. The calculation of b is illustrated in
        the next section. Since the residual variance of liability is unity, the use of b is necessary to
        properly adjust the underlying variate for the effect of the residual covariance between both



        Analysis of Ordered Categorical Traits                               231
   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252