Page 43 - DPR Rishikesh Legacy_Neat
P. 43

4.2.5 ADVANTAGES OF BIOMINING
                      1.  Recovered materials such as ferrous metals, plastic, aluminium, and glass can be
                         sold if markets exist for these materials.
                      2.  Reclaimed soil can be used on site as daily cover material on other landfill cells,
                         thus avoiding the cost of importing cover material. Also a market might exist for
                         reclaimed soil for use in other applications such as compost.It can thus avoid cost
                         of virgin soil and save the natural resource.
                      3.  Combustible  reclaimed  waste  can  be  mixed  with  fresh  waste  and  burned  to
                         produce energy.
                      4.  By  reducing  the  size  of  the  landfill  footprint  through  cell  reclamation  the  facility
                         operator may also be able to either lower the cost of closing the landfill or make
                         land available for other uses.
                      5.  The value of the land that is thus reclaimed, when deployed for other uses.
                      6.  Hazardous wastes if uncovered during biomining especially at older landfills could
                         be managed in an environmentally sound manner.
                      7.  Decreased  or  completely  avoided  expense  of  any  closure  procedure  and  the
                         monitoring that follows such closure procedures.


               4.3 TECHNOLOGYSELECTION

                      From  the  field  observation,  it  is  evident  that  the  dumping  ground  is  a  great
                      nuisance to the citizens of Rishikesh. Also, considering the ultimatum given by the
                      land owner to vacate the site, there is no other option than recovering the land by
                      way of removing the legacy waste accumulated at the site. Since site needs to be
                      handed over to the owner, scientific capping of dumpsite may not be a right option
                      as  no  further  development  could  be  undertaken  on  the  scientifically  closed
                      dumpsite for at-least 15 years of time.
































                                                                                                        43
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48