Page 689 - Microeconomics, Fourth Edition
P. 689

c16GeneralEquilibriumTheory.qxd  8/16/10  9:13 PM  Page 663







                                           16.2 GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS: MANY MARKETS                      663

                         An industry that was particularly affected by the  income effects were becoming important to consumer
                      rise in oil prices was automobiles. In 2008, sales of  demand, as sales of cars, both imported and domestic,
                      sport-utility vehicles (SUVs) declined 25 percent. At the  began to decline considerably as well. In addition, the
                      same time, domestic car sales fell 7 percent, imported  fall in demand for SUVs, trucks, and cars affected the
                      car sales rose 10 percent, but sales of imported light  labor market. Seasonally adjusted employment in the
                      trucks fell 22 percent. These results strongly suggest  motor vehicle and parts industries declined by 125,000
                      that substitution effects were more important than  over this period. Of course, that unemployment fur-
                      income effects. Consumers were shifting from vehicles  ther reduced demand for many consumer goods, and
                      with low- fuel efficiency, such as SUVs and trucks, and  increasing problems in the housing market (especially
                      toward smaller and more fuel-efficient cars (imported  in cities such as Detroit in which vehicle manufacturing
                      cars tend to fit into those categories). However, by the  is an important part of the local economy) contributed
                      end of 2008  the severity of the recession meant that  further to the recession.



                         The general equilibrium analysis in Figure 16.9 highlights the relationship between
                      the scarcity of factors of production, the relative prices of those factors, and the distribu-
                      tion of income in the economy. In the economy in Figure 16.9, the aggregate supply of
                      capital is much less than the aggregate supply of labor (i.e., S is closer to its vertical axis
                                                                       K
                      than is S ). As a result, the price of capital services exceeds the price of labor (i.e., capital
                             L
                      services trade at a price premium compared to labor services). This, in turn, allows the
                      providers of capital inputs—the white-collar households in our economy—to earn higher
                      incomes than the providers of labor inputs—primarily blue-collar households.
                         Learning-By-Doing Exercise 16.2 shows how to write the supply-equals-demand
                      conditions that determine a general equilibrium for our simple economy.



                                 LEARNING-BY-DOING EXERCISE 16.2
                          S
                          D
                        E
                                Finding the Conditions for a General Equilibrium with Four Markets
                                Suppose that the households in the simple economy depicted in Figure 16.9 have the characteristics
                      given in the following table:
                                        Number of        Labor Supplied     Capital Supplied
                                        Households       per Household       per Household       Household Income

                       Blue Collar          100             60 units             0 units           I B (w, r)   60w
                       White Collar         100             10 units            50 units         I W (w, r)   10w   50r

                      Also suppose that the supply and demand curves for the  table, where  X is the overall quantity of energy de-
                      markets in this economy are as shown in the following  manded and Y is the overall quantity of food demanded: 4

                                       Energy              Food                Labor                  Capital
                                            1  2               1  1
                       Supply         P x   w r  3       P y   w r  2         L   7000*             K   5000*
                                            3
                                                               2
                                                                                  2       1              1       1
                                       50I W   75I B      50I W   25I B     X r   3  Y r  2        2X w  3  Y w  2
                       Demand      P x                P Y                L    a  b    a  b     K     a  b    a  b
                                            X                  Y             3 w     2 w           3   r    2  r
                      *Based on supply per household, as shown in the table showing the number of households above [L   (100   10)
                      (100   60)   7000; K   (100   50)   (100   0)   5000].
                      4 In the Appendix, we show how these curves are derived from the cost-minimization problems of individ-
                      ual firms and the utility-maximization problems of individual households.
   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694