Page 32 - BTC Debunking the diet
P. 32

Next up is South Beach. So named for the area in Miami where everybody
        looks thin and gorgeous (think Umhlanga), this diet has also been criticised
        for  being  a  fad  diet.  It  gained  immense  popularity  in  2003  after  a  book
        extolling  its  virtues  was  written  by  a  guy  called  Arthur  Agatston.  More
        specifically, Agatston formulated the diet in conjunction with Marie Almon,
        who was the chief dietician at Mount Sinai Medical Centre in Miami Beach.
        He had a practice in nearby South Beach.


        The magic bullet

        Carbohydrate restriction is the key ingredient to weight loss, as with Banting.
        Atkins proclaims that because it takes more calories to burn fat than carbs,
        you consume more calories as you are eating, and every bit helps. Fat is also
        purported to keep you feeling fuller for longer.


        Some critics have lauded the fact that South Beach promotes high-fibre low-
        glycaemic  carbs,  unsaturated  fats,  and  lean  protein,  and  as  such  is  more
        balanced than either Atkins or Banting, partly because it draws a distinction
        between good and bad fats and carbs.

        The pros

        The Americans are particularly vain (don’t we just love ‘em), so you can be
        sure either of these diets will lead to weight loss. The copious amount of
        beautiful  flesh  in  Miami’s  South  Beach  bears  witness  to  this,  while  in  LA
        people on Atkins lined the streets half a mile thick, to quote an old song.

        The cons

        Like  so  many  diets,  including  half  the  ones  in  this  book,  the  medical  and
        nutritional fraternity both roll their eyes and peer down their noses at their
        lack of sustainability.

           32




                This booklet © 2019, Rob Rodell, all rights reserved.
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37