Page 339 - ивл 2017 Касиль
P. 339

Оценка жизненно важных функций организма в процессе ИВЛ...


   13.  Bernards J., Mekeirele М., Hoffmann Br. et al. Hemodynamic monitoring: To cali­
      brate or not to calibrate? Part 2 - Non-calibrated techniques // Anaesthesiol. Intensive
      Ther. - 2015. - Vol. 47 (5). - P. 501-516.
   14.  Cavallaro E, Sandroni C., Marano C. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of passive leg raising
      for prediction of fluid responsiveness in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis
      of clinical studies // Intensive Care Med. - 2010, Sep. - Vol. 36 (9). - P. 1475-1483.
   15.  Cecconi M„ De Backer D., Antonelli M. et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and
      hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care
      Medicine // Intensive Care Med. - 2014, Dec. - Vol. 40 (12). - P. 1795-1815.
   16.  Davies S.J., Minhas S., Wilson R.J. et al. Comparison of stroke volume and fluid
      responsiveness measurements in commonly used technologies for goal-direct the­
      rapy // J. Clin. Anesth. - 2013, Sep. - Vol. 25 (6). - P. 466-474.
   17.  Eremenko A., Balykov I., Chaus N. et al. Use of an extracorporeal arteriovenosus
      tubing loop to measure cardiac output in intensive care unit patients by ultrasound
      velocity dilution //ASAIO J. - 1998, Sep.-Oct. - Vol. 44 (5). - P. M462-464.
   18.  Eremenko A.A., Safarov P.N. Flow-regulated extracorporeal arteriovenous tubing
      loop for cardiac output measurements by ultrasound velocity dilution: validation in
      post-cardiac surgery intensive care unit patients // ASAIO J. - 2010, Nov.-Dec. -
      Vol. 56 (6). - P. 522-526.
   19.  Fagnoul D., Vincent J.L., Backer de D. Cardiac output measurements using the
      bioreactance technique in critically ill patients // Crit. Care. - 2012, Nov. 9. -
      Vol. 16 (6). - P. 460.
   20.  Galstyan G., Bychinin M., Alexanyan M., Gorodetsky V. Comparison of cardiac
      output and blood volumes in intrathoracic compartments measured by ultrasound
      dilution and transpulmonary thermodilution methods // Intensive Care Med. - 2010,
      Dec. - Vol. 36 (12). - P. 2140-2144.
   21.  Galstyan G., Bychinin M., Alexanyan M., Gorodetsky V. Novel approach to measure
      Extravascular Lung Water (EVLW) using transpulmonary Ultrasound-Thermal
      Dilution (TUTD) method. - 24th Annual Congress ESICM, Berlin, 2011. - P. 241.
   22.  Jullien T, Valtier B., Hongnat J.M. et al. Incidence of tricuspid regurgitation and in
      mechanically ventilated patients. A color Doppler and contrast echocardiographic
      study // Chest. - 1995, Feb. - Vol. 107 (2). - P. 488-493.
   23.  Kupersztych-Hagege E., Teboul J.L., Artigas A. et al. Bioreactance is not reliable
      for estimating cardiac output and the effects of passive leg raising in critically ill
      patients // Br. J. Anaesth. - 2013, Dec. - Vol. 111 (6). - P. 961-966.
   24.  Marik P.E., Monnet X., Teboul J.L. Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid the­
      rapy // Ann. Intensive Care. - 2011, Mar. 21. - Vol. 1 (1). - P. 1.
   25.  Marini J.J., Wheeler A.P. Critical care medicine. The essentials. - Baltimore: Wil­
      liams & Wilkins, 1997. - 640 p.
   26.  Monnet X., Teboul J.-L. Assessment of volume responsiveness during mechanical
      ventilation: recent advances // Crit. Care. -2013. - Vol. 17 (2). -P. 217.
   27.  Monnet X., Osman D., Ridel C. et al. Predicting volume responsiveness by using the
      end-expiratory occlusion in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients //
      Crit. Care Med. - 2009, Mar. - Vol. 37 (3). - P. 951-956.
   28.  Morris A.H. Protocol control of mechanical ventiation in ARDS / In: «Yearbook of
      intensive care and emergency medicine». J.-L.Vincent (Ed.). - Berlin-Heidelberg-
      NY: Springer Verlag, 1994. - P. 495-510.




                      Библиотека русанеста
   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344