Page 442 - Adams and Stashak's Lameness in Horses, 7th Edition
P. 442

408   Chapter 3




  VetBooks.ir





                                                                                  Figure 3.234.  Low‐field transverse
                                                                                  horizontal T2 FSE (A) and transverse
                                                                                  oblique T1 GRE (B) images of a horse
                                                                                  with a keratoma of the hoof wall. There is
                                                                                  an extensive circular area of T2 signal
                                                                                  void (left arrow) and T1 signal hypointen­
                                                                                  sity intruding from the hoof wall into the
                                                                                  dermis and corresponding large but
                                      A                                      B
                                                                                  smooth osseous defect (right arrow).




                                                                                 Figure 3.235.  Low‐field sagittal T2*
                                                                                 GRE (A) and dorsal T2 FSE (B) images of
                                                                                 horse with a nail puncture of the lateral
                                                                                 sulcus of the frog. There are susceptibility
                                                                                 artifacts in the frog tissue caused by either
                                                                                 hemosiderin or metallic debris in the
                                                                                 penetrating tract (black arrow). Linear T2
                                                                                 signal hyperintensity suggests there is
                                                                                 fluid in the tract that continues into a
                                                                                 parasagittal breach of the lateral lobe of
                                                                                 the deep digital flexor tendon (white
                                           A                                 B   arrow).



            navicular bone, and the DIP joint.  MRI not only allows   Lesions of the Digital Annular Ligaments
                                         65
            assessment of tract direction and depth but is the only   Isolated cases of desmopathy of the distal and proximal
            imaging technique that permits early recognition of ten­  digital annular ligaments,  the axial and abaxial palmar
                                                                                     36
            don disease (Figure 3.235), osseous injury, and involve­  ligaments of the proximal interphalangeal joint, the
            ment of surrounding soft tissue structures.  Another   proximal ligament of the digital cushion, the chondro­
            study highlighted  the importance  of using  T2 FSE   compedal ligament, and the chondrosesamoidean liga­
            sequences to look at tendon boundaries and determine   ment have also been observed. MRI characteristics of
            tendon involvement because signal voids created by fer­  desmopathy are focal or diffuse thickening, focal or
            rous material or hemosiderin can preclude full assess­    diffuse areas of signal hyperintensity within the liga­
            ment of the tendon on GRE sequences. 155,181       ment at the level of the proximal interphalangeal joint,
              Generalized osseous fluid in the distal phalanx and   and occasionally adhesion formation. 36
            navicular bone with markedly increased STIR signal
            throughout the spongiosa of these bones may be one of
            the earliest signs of synovial sepsis of the navicular bursa
            and/or DIP joint or of osteomyelitis.  This appearance   Lesions that are Poorly Detectable with MRI
                                           191
            of generalized “bone edema” should alert the clinician   Some tissue abnormalities in the foot do not show up
            to the likelihood of penetration of at least one synovial   well on MR images. Abnormalities of the hoof and sen­
            cavity (Figure 3.215).                             sitive laminae of the solar and heel regions of the foot
              Gadolinium contrast fistulography may be useful to   may not result in obvious signal abnormalities. Although
            improve the identification of fistulous tracts in the foot. 66  some marked subsolar abscesses or bruises may result in
                                                               dermal and osseous signal increase in the solar region of
            Lesions of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint      the foot, many horses with solar pain responsive to
                                                               application of hoof testers have unremarkable foot MR
              Lesions in the proximal interphalangeal joint are   images. Similarly, many horses with poor dorsopalmar
            rare. Occasionally focal subchondral bone damage with   foot balance resulting in palmar heel pain produce unre­
            osteolysis and associated osseous fluid may be a cause of   markable MRI scans. Early hyaline or fibrocartilage
            lameness. Osseous cyst‐like lesions may be an incidental   degeneration of the DIP joint or navicular flexor surface
            finding. Osteophytes may be visible at the joint margins,   as well as mild fibrillation of the dorsal surface of
            but radiography is generally more sensitive for this find­  the DDFT in the navicular bursa may also be difficult to
            ing of osteoarthritis than MRI.                    identify. 158
   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447