Page 450 - Adams and Stashak's Lameness in Horses, 7th Edition
P. 450

416   Chapter 3


            MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING OF                      to the proximal plantar metatarsal region with diagnos­
                                                               tic anesthesia illustrates the concern that local anesthetic
            THE METACARPAL AND METATARSAL REGIONS
  VetBooks.ir  Introduction                                    techniques lack specificity for accurate localization of
                                                                                             6,93
                                                               pain causing lameness in this area.
              Lameness caused by pain associated with the proxi­
            mal palmar metacarpal and plantar metatarsal regions
            is common in equine athletes. Some of the causes of   MRI Abnormalities in the Proximal Metacarpal/
            lameness in this region are difficult to diagnose accu­  Metatarsal Regions
            rately  because  affected  horses  frequently  have  no  or   Proximal Suspensory Desmopathy
            equivocal radiological or ultrasonographic signs of
            disease. It may thus not always be possible to distin­  The normal MRI anatomy of the fore and hind suspen­
            guish between  normal anatomy, imaging artifacts, and   sory ligaments has been described in detail. 14,59,94,124,127  The
            structural abnormalities of the suspensory ligament   normal suspensory ligament is a low signal intensity
            using ultrasonography.   The tomographic nature of   structure of hypointense dense collagen fibers, inter­
                                 52
            MRI allows assessment of size and signal changes   spersed with two centrally located high signal intensity
            within the complex anatomy of this region and results   tissue bundles, that each  contain sparse muscle  fibers
            in good soft tissue contrast and detail without    surrounded by a layer of loose and adipose connective
            superimposition.                                   tissue and neurovascular structures. Normal cross‐sec­
              There have been several reports with widely varying   tional areas have been defined for the proximal part of
            results on the incidence of injuries diagnosed with both   the suspensory ligament in the forelimb and vary from
            low‐ and high‐field MRI systems in the metacarpal and   1.61 to 1.90  cm  in one study  and from 1.94 to 2.32 in
                                                                             2
                                                                                         5
            metatarsal regions (Tables  3.5 and 3.6). 5,6,28,93,128  In   another.   There is  considerable  variation  between
                                                                      127
              general, transverse MRI slices that are aligned perpen­  horses in the MRI appearance of the proximal portion
                                                                                               124
            dicular to the long axis of the cannon bone (parallel   of the forelimb suspensory ligament,  due to the varia­
            with the carpometacarpal/tarsometatarsal joint) are most   tion in the amount, shape, and signal intensity of the
                                                                                          127
            useful for diagnosis.                              muscle and fat tissue bundles.  Within these bundles,
              In the forelimb (Table 3.5), the reported distribution   high signal intensity areas correspond to adipose tissue
            of MRI abnormalities appears to depend on field    and intermediate signal intensity areas to muscle tissue.
            strength of the system used. A very low incidence of soft   The large variability in the MRI appearance of the prox­
            tissue injury in the proximal metacarpal region has been   imal portion of the  forelimb suspensory  ligament in
            reported in a low‐field study,  while high‐field studies   non‐lame horses should be borne in mind when inter­
                                     128
                                                                                               127
            consistently indicate much higher numbers of injuries of   preting MR images of lame horses.  Therefore, com­
            the accessory ligament of the DDFT and the suspensory   parison with the contralateral limb or with published
            ligament. 5,28  This may be explained by easier recognition   reference images may be useful to help with interpreta­
            of bone signal change than soft tissue change in standing   tion of suspected MRI changes. 124
            low‐field MR systems, because motion artifact in stand­  In hindlimbs, the suspensory ligament starts as a nar­
            ing patients can lead to poor recognition of anatomical   row triangular band, evolves into a right‐angled triangle
            detail as well as of signs of injury in soft tissue struc­  that is wider on the lateral aspect than medially, and
            tures. Motion artifact results in blurring of signal and   contains a dorsal central cleft dividing it in two lobes. At
            loss of contour definition of the muscle and adipose tis­  4 cm distal to the tarsometatarsal joint, it becomes oval
            sue bundles within the suspensory ligament. Inability to   to bean shaped and separates away from the plantar
            accurately define these muscle and adipose tissue bun­  cortex of the third metatarsal bone to continue distally,
            dles  hampers  the  ability  to  distinguish  these  bundles   while both lobes merge into one oval ligament.
                                                                                                              161
            from areas of fiber damage in the collagenous part of   Normal cross‐sectional areas have been defined for the
            the suspensory ligament. Lesion occurrence in forelimbs   proximal part of the suspensory ligament and have var­
                                                                                      2 161
            is also heavily influenced by the horse’s discipline and   ied from 1.12 to 2.23  cm .  Injuries of the proximal
            age. A recent high‐field study showed a much higher   part of the suspensory ligament may result in enlarge­
            prevalence of osseous abnormalities of the third meta­  ment, contour changes, focal and diffuse signal increase,
            carpal bone in young Quarter horses used for cutting   and periligamentous fibrosis.
            than previously reported in studies of mixed breed sport   Abnormalities are best seen in transverse PD images.
            horse populations. 5,28                            Lesions can be graded as mild, moderate, or severe,
              As the only retrospective MRI studies of the metatar­  depending on the abnormal signal intensity and the pro­
            sal region available have been performed with high‐field   portion of total cross‐sectional area of the ligament
            magnets, 6,28,93  a comparison between low‐ and high‐field   affected.
            injury prevalence is not possible for the hindlimb    Enlargement of the cross‐sectional area of the suspen­
            (Table 3.6). However, given that motion artifact tends to   sory ligament may vary from mild to severe, but because
            be more pronounced in standing MRI of the hindlimb   of the variation in size within limbs and between horses,
            than the forelimb, the same concerns apply. By far the   this feature should be interpreted with caution especially
            most common injury in the proximal metatarsal region   when the enlargement is mild. 5,93,127,161  Even though
            is desmopathy of the proximal part of the suspensory   marked  enlargement  may  result  in  a decrease  of  the
            ligament with or without an enthesis injury of the third   space between the dorsal margin of the suspensory liga­
            metatarsal  bone  at  the  attachment  of  the  suspensory   ment and the palmar or plantar surface of the bone,
            ligament. The high occurrence of MR abnormalities of   periligamentous fibrosis and adhesion formation are
            the distal tarsal region in horses with lameness localized   uncommon features of proximal suspensory desmopathy.
   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455