Page 27 - Book Chapter
P. 27

Kajian Dalam Bidang Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi: Filosofi, Teori, dan Praktik

            criticism intelligently and patiently (az-Zummar: 39-40; al-An>am: 116),
            avoiding jokes that exaggerated (HR Abu Dhar), conveying the message
            gently  (Thaha:  44,  al-Imran:  159),  conveying  the  message  with  noble
            words (al-Isra: 23) by saying (apologizing and giving) the word apology
            (Al-An>aam:  54,  HR  Muslim)  and  thanked  words  (HR Al-Thabarany,
            HR Al-Turmudzi, HR Ahmad, HR Abdullah bin Ahmad), and conveying
            useful words (HR Yunus ibn Ubaidillah).


                                 III. RESEARCH METHOD
                The object of the research was the lecturers of UIN Syarif Hidayatullah
            Jakarta  as  many  as  989  scattered  in  11  faculties  with  the  amount  of
            different  composition.  The  primary  data  were  91  questionnaires  of  the
            lecturers that were selected by stratified random sampling technique with
            the aim of making homogeneous properties of the population considered
            heterogeneous  (Cochran  1977;  Krisyanto  2014).  The  sample  size  was
            obtained by Taro Yamane formula of the known population size (Riduan &
            Kuncoro 2011), with 10% precision and 95% confidence level.
                Data  was  collected  in  questionnairy  form.  The  questionnaire  was
            divided into 6 variables: information literacy (X1), media literacy (X2),
            moral literacy (X3), learning and thinking skill (X4), information behavior
            (Z), prophetic-humanization communication behavior (Y). Measurements
            were categorized using the interval scale 1 - 5. The raw obtained data was
            interpreted in the qualitative sense: 5 = Very High (ST); 4 = Height (T); 3
            = Medium (S); 2 = Low (R); and 1 = Very Low (SR).
                The validation test of the questionnaire showed that all items of the
            question had significant value 0.000 (smaller than) < α = 0.05, and the
            annul of r-test 0.579 was above r-table 0.206. It meant that the instrument
            had been valid. Likewise, the results of reliability tests showed the value of
            Cronbach>s Alpha 0.872 (greater than) > 0.7, it meant that the instrument
            was reliable.
                Meanwhile,  the  hypothesized  model  was  tested  with  using  path
            analysis,  SPSS  22.  It  is  a  statistical  analysis  technique  developed  from
            multiple regression analysis, as explained by Riduan & Kuncoro  (2011)
            basically this path analysis is a standardized regression coefficient that is
            regression coefficient calculated from database set in standard number or
            Z-score (dataset with average value = 0 and standard deviation = 1). This
            method was used to test the strength or absence of correlation of two or
            more related variables to independent variables with a significant value






            362                                   An Analysis of Integrated E-Literacy ...
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32