Page 48 - The Evolution Impasse 2
P. 48

46  Miller Experiment, The



                  In fact, present-day ev o lu tion ist  nev er  turn  in to  an oth er  spe cies  of
               au thor i ties ad mit that the var i a tions  mam mal, such as gi raffes or el e -
               they re fer to as mi cro-ev o lu tion can -  phants.  The  dif fer ent  chaf finch es
               not cre ate new ge net ic in for ma tion  that Darwin saw on the Galapagos
               and thus, can not give rise to ma cro-  Islands are, in the same way, ex am -
               ev o lu tion.  The  ev o lu tion ist  bi ol o -  ples of the var i a tion that con sti tutes
               gists Scott Gilbert, John Opitz and  no   ev i dence   for   ev o lu tion.
               Rudolf Raff de scribe this po si tion in  Therefore, the or i gin of spe cies will
               a 1996 ar ti cle pub lished in the jour -  re main a ques tion that can nev er be
               nal Developmental Biology:          an swered in terms of ev o lu tion.
                  The Modern Synthesis [the neo-
                  Darwinist  the o ry]  is  a  re mark a ble
                  achieve ment. However, start ing in the  MILLER EXPERIMENT, THE
                  1970s,  many  bi ol o gists  be gan  ques -  Research in to the or i gin of life to
                  tion ing its ad e qua cy in ex plain ing ev -
                                                   which ev o lu tion ists at tach the great -
                  o lu tion. Genetics might be ad e quate for
                                                   est es teem is the Miller ex per i ment,
                  ex plain ing mi cro ev o lu tion, but mi cro -
                                                   car ried out by the American re -
                  ev o lu tion ary chan ges in gene fre quen -
                                                   search er Stanley Miller in 1953. (The
                  cy were not seen as able to turn a rep -
                                                   ex per i ment is al so known as the
                  tile in to a mam mal or to con vert a fish
                                                   Urey-Miller Experiment, due to the
                  in to  an  am phib i an.  Microevolution
                                                   con tri bu tion  made  by  Miller's
                  looks at ad ap ta tions that con cern on ly
                  the sur viv al of the fit test, not the ar riv -  Chicago   University   su per vi sor
                  al of the fit test. As Goodwin (1995)  Harold Urey.)
                  points out, "the or i gin of spe cies—  Miller's aim was to es tab lish an
                  Darwin's  prob lem—re mains  un -  ex per i men tal en vi ron ment to show
                  solved."   42                    that ami no ac ids, the build ing blocks
                  The  var i a tions  that  Darwinism  of pro teins, could have formed by
               has re gard ed for a cen tu ry or so as  chance in the life less world of bil -
               proof  of  ev o lu tion  ac tu al ly  have  lions of years ago.
               noth ing to do with the or i gin of spe -  In his ex per i ment, Miller used a
               cies. Horses may be cross bred in dif -  com bi na tion of gas ses that he as -
               fer ent com bi na tions for mil lions of  sumed had ex ist ed in the Earth's pri -
               years and dif fer ent strains of horse  mor di al  at mos phere  (but  which
               may be ob tained. Yet hors es will  were lat er de ter mined not to have
                                                   ex ist ed in it), such as am mo nia,

                                                               The Evolution Impasse II
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53