Page 201 - BUKU SYNOPSIS

Table 29. Descriptive Statistics of Text’s Length

Writing Texts The Average Number of words
Mean Median Minimum Maximum
Text 1 – Cycle 1
LoT of 1st Draft 155.86 150 42 280
nd
LoT 2 Draft (SA) 186.25 186 113 320
rd
LoT 3 Draft (PA) 221.45 228 149 295
th
LoT 4 Draft (LA) 246.75 255 143 315
Text 2 – Cycle 2
LoT of 1st Draft 168.27 173 71 267
nd
LoT 2 Draft (SA) 256.61 260 152 344
rd
LoT 3 Draft (PA) 266.36 263 162 373
th
LoT 4 Draft (LA) 270.72 269 198 321

Table 29 shows that the mean score of the average number of words produced

by the students for each draft in two cycles increase gradually. It can be seen

that the students could generate their after receiving feedback from their shelf,

peers, and the lecturers. Even though the students could produce more words

in the first draft in cycle 1 than in the cycle 2, overall, they show an

improvement at the rest of the drafts in cycle 2. In addition, the percentage of

the students who can write the texts above the median score and target words

can be seen in the following graph.

Figure 25. The Percentage of Student Reaching the Median and Target Words

100
80
60
40

20
0
LoT of !st LoT 2nd LoT 3rd LoT 4th LoT of 1st LoT 2nd LoT 3rd LoT 4th
Draft_T1 Draft (SA)Draft (PA) Draft (LA) Draft_T2 Draft (SA)Draft (PA) Draft (LA)
< Median > Median 250-300

196