Page 364 - Chayei Adam LAYOUT sivan 5782

Chayei Adam - K’lal 148 - Laws of Lulav & Daled Minim

]11[ If one didn’t say the beracha before picking it up, he can still say it because
51
shaking it is also a part of the mitzva. However, it is not clear if this extends to
52
circling [during hoshanos], as this is only a remembrance of the Beis HaMikdash.
However, once he puts it down after he has completed the mitzva, he can no
longer say a beracha.

]12[ It appears to me that if they didn’t bring him a lulav until the middle of
hallel, that he may recite a beracha between the perakim, meaning between each
chapter of Tehillim. 53

]13[ After saying the beracha, one should shake the lulav, even if he made the
55
56
54
beracha [earlier] before hallel. He should also shake it every time he says
‘hodu’, and during hodu which is said twice at the end of hallel he should shake it
םדו רשב
the Maharil, but concedes that it is not the Rosh.
absolutely required. Many acharonim (Bach, See above note 40 regarding reciting
Taz, Gra) however disagree and require one to the beracha before the fulfillments of the
remove them. Accordingly, the Elya Rabba mitzva. As a fourth possible answer, Tosfos
writes that if one forgot, he should shake lulav suggests that although he may have
again without a beracha. One who has a discharged his obligation when he picked the
bandage which cannot be removed, can be lulav up, he can still recite the beracha since
lenient (Aruch Hashulchan, Be’er Moshe). the mitzva continues through the
na’anu’im. This would seem to include those
51. Magen Avraham, Mishna Berura. See during hallel. (See previous note.) Encircling
however Halichos Shlomo that they refer only the bimah with lulav in hand however, is not
to shaking the lulav immediately after reciting an extension of the mitzva of lulav, but rather
the beracha. It is evident from his own note a remembrance of the avodah in the Beis
here that the Chayei Adam understands this to HaMikdash where they carried aravos around
extend until na’anu’im (wavings) of the lulav the mizbayach. See however Bikurei Yaakov
during hallel as well. who disagrees.
אכ

52. Chayei Adam’s note: However from 53. See Shulchan Aruch O.C. 66:2 that one
Tosfos (Succah 39a) it sounds like anything who didn’t have tefillin until the after borchu,
which [even] enhances the mitzva [can still may put it on during krias shema with a
qualify as] before fulfilling it and so writes beracha, between the berachos or perakim of

364