Page 138 - 111111

¥ÿ≈æ“À

À≈—ß®“°∑’Ë·æ∑¬å‰¥â·®âߢâÕ¡Ÿ≈·°àºŸâªÉ«¬ Õ¬à“߇撬ßæÕ·≈â« »“≈Õÿ∑∏√≥å¢Õß√—∞·§≈‘øÕ√å‡π’¬

¬—ß°≈à“«Õ’°«à“ çA physician violates his duty to his patient and subjects himself
to liability if he withholds any facts which are necessary to form the basis
(Òı)
of an intelligent consent by the patient to the proposed treatment.é

·ª≈‡ªìπ¿“…“‰∑¬‰¥â«à“ ç·æ∑¬å‰¥â™◊ËÕ«à“ΩÉ“ΩóπÀπâ“∑’Ë∑’Ëμπ¡’μàÕºŸâªÉ«¬ ·≈–μâÕßμ°Õ¬Ÿà¿“¬„μâ
§«“¡√—∫º‘¥ À“°·æ∑¬å‰¡à‡ªî¥‡º¬¢âÕ‡∑Á®®√‘ß„¥∑’Ë®”‡ªìπ·≈–‡ªìπæ◊Èπ∞“π„π°“√μ—¥ ‘π„®Õ¬à“ß

™“≠©≈“¥·°àºŸâªÉ«¬°àÕπ∑’˺ŸâªÉ«¬„À⧫“¡¬‘π¬Õ¡μàÕ°“√√—°…“∑’Ë·æ∑¬å·π–π”é ‡ªìπ∑’Ëπà“ π„®

Õ¬à“߬‘Ëß«à“»“≈‰¥â§—¥≈Õ°∂âÕ¬§”¥—ß°≈à“«·∫∫§”μàÕ§”¡“®“°§”·∂≈ß°“√≥å¢Õß«‘∑¬“≈—¬
(Òˆ)
»—≈¬·æ∑¬å·Ààߪ√–‡∑» À√—∞Õ‡¡√‘°“‡Õß À≈—ß®“°§¥’ Salgo ‡°‘¥¢÷Èπ ∑”„Àâªí®®ÿ∫—π·æ∑¬å

„π∑ÿ°√—∞¢Õß À√—∞Õ‡¡√‘°“¡’Àπâ“∑’Ë∑’ËμâÕ߉¥â√—∫§«“¡¬‘π¬Õ¡∑’ˉ¥â√—∫°“√∫Õ°°≈à“«®“°ºŸâªÉ«¬°àÕπ
∫“ß√—∞ ‡ªìπ°“√°”Àπ¥Àπâ“∑’Ë¥—ß°≈à“«¢Õß·æ∑¬å‚¥¬∫—≠≠—μ‘°ÆÀ¡“¬‡ªìπ≈“¬≈—°…≥åÕ—°…√

(statute) „π¢≥–∑’Ë∫“ß√—∞‡ªìπ°“√°”À𥂥¬§”æ‘æ“°…“¢Õß»“≈´÷Ëß¡’º≈‡ªìπ°ÆÀ¡“¬
(Ò˜)
(common law) ‚¥¬§«“¡‡™◊ËÕ∑’Ë«à“ §«“¡¬‘π¬Õ¡∑’ˉ¥â√—∫°“√∫Õ°°≈à“«π’È ‡ªìπ‡§√◊ËÕß¡◊Õ
∑“ß°ÆÀ¡“¬∑’˙૬≈¥§«“¡‰¡à ¡¥ÿ≈¢ÕßÕ”π“®·≈–§«“¡√Ÿâ√–À«à“ߺŸâªÉ«¬°—∫·æ∑¬å ∑”„Àâ

(Ò¯)
ºŸâªÉ«¬¡’Õ”π“®„π°“√μ—¥ ‘π„®¡“°¬‘Ëߢ÷Èπ

¡“μ√∞“π¢Õß°“√‡ªî¥‡º¬¢âÕ¡Ÿ≈¢Õß·æ∑¬å

¡“μ√“ ¯ «√√§Àπ÷Ëß ¢Õßæ√–√“™∫—≠≠—μ‘ ÿ¢¿“æ·Ààß™“μ‘ æ.». Úıı ∫—≠≠—μ‘«à“

ç„π°“√∫√‘°“√ “∏“√≥ ÿ¢ ∫ÿ§≈“°√¥â“π “∏“√≥ ÿ¢μâÕß·®âߢâÕ¡Ÿ≈¥â“π ÿ¢¿“æ∑’ˇ°’ˬ«¢âÕß

°—∫°“√„Àâ∫√‘°“√„À⺟â√—∫∫√‘°“√∑√“∫ Õ¬à“߇撬ßæÕ ∑’˺Ÿâ√—∫∫√‘°“√®–„™âª√–°Õ∫°“√μ—¥ ‘π„®

„π°“√√—∫À√◊Õ‰¡à√—∫∫√‘°“√„¥...é ªí≠À“À√◊Õ¢âÕæ‘®“√≥“∑’ˇ°‘¥¢÷Èπ‡À¡◊Õπ°—π∑—Ë«‚≈°‡¡◊ËÕ

(Òı)
Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. Board of Trustees, 317 P.2d 170, 181 (Cal. Ct. App. 1957).
(Òˆ)
Jaime Staples King & Benjamin W. Moulton, Rethinking Informed Consent: The Case for
Shared Medical Decision-Making, 32 AM. J.L. & MED. 429, 440 (2006).
(Ò˜)
Tenenbaum, supra note 9, at 706.
(Ò¯)
MARK A. HALL ET AL., MEDICAL LIABILITY AND TREATMENT RELATIONSHIPS 194 (4th
ed. 2018).

情¿“§¡ - ‘ßÀ“§¡ ÚıˆÚ 127
127
127
127
127