Page 206 - 4- Leading_from_Within
P. 206

involving a group of people may pose a problem.  For example, the group
               process  can appear fair and democratic but really only be a gesture that
               covers  up the fact  that certain group  members  or the group leader  have
               already  decided.    Group  decision-making  also  takes  more  time  than

               individual decisions and can be burdensome if some group members do
               not do their assigned work, divert the group  with self-centered or
               unproductive behaviors, or miss meetings.


               Conversely, though, group decisions are often more informed, since all
               group members develop a  shared understanding of a  problem through
               discussion and debate. The  shared  understanding may also be more
               complex and deep than  what  an individual  would develop, because the
               group members are exposed to a variety of viewpoints that can broaden

               their own perspectives.


               This situation  in which a  group  finds  itself certainly  affects decision-
               making. One key aspect is the degree of freedom that the group possesses
               to make its own decisions, secure its own resources, and initiate its own
               actions.  Some  groups  have  to  go  through  multiple  approval  processes
               before they can do anything, while others are self-directed, self-governing,

               and self-sustaining.

               Uncertainty also  has a  major impact on  decision-making.    In general,

               groups deal with more uncertainty in decision-making than do individuals
               because of the increased number of variables that comes with adding more
               people to a situation. Individual group members can’t know  what  other
               group members  are thinking, whether or not they  are  doing their work,
               and how committed they  are to the  group. So the  size of  a group is  a
               powerful situational influence,  as it  adds to  uncertainty and complicates

               communication.


               Organizations, which are more formally structured than ad hoc groups,
               have routines, practices, processes, missions,  and cultures  that  condition
               how problems are defined, information  is shared, goals are identified,
               options are generated,  and, ultimately, how decisions are made. All of this
               needs to be taken into consideration in the decision-making process.  The
               creativity  and effectiveness of this process is certainly  impacted by the




               David Kolzow                                                                          206
   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211