Page 81 - Q - 9 - 2
P. 81

50               √«¡º≈ß“π∑“ß«‘™“°“√¢Õß»“ μ√“®“√¬å®‘μμ‘ μ‘ß»¿—∑‘¬å




                        °“√™¥„™â§à“‡ ’¬À“¬∂◊Õ‡ªìπ°“√≈ß‚∑… (punitive damages) °“√≈ß‚∑…∑’ˇªìπ

                 ·∫∫øÕ√塇™àππ’È ‡√’¬°«à“ çformal manneré À√◊Õ çgesellschaften manneré

                        Ù. ≈–‡¡‘¥¡’«—μ∂ÿª√– ß§å∑’Ë√«¡°—πÀ≈“¬ª√–°“√‡√’¬°«à“ cluster of Ideas §◊Õ

                            Ù.Ò compensatory idea

                            Ù.Ú idea of satisfaction

                                                 (Òı)
                            Ù.Û deterrent idea :     §◊Õ§«“¡§‘¥∑’Ë®–∑”„Àâª√–™“™πÀ≈’°‡≈’ˬ߰“√
                 ∑”§«“¡‡ ’¬À“¬ ‡æ√“–©–π—Èπ∫∑∫“∑¢Õß≈–‡¡‘¥§◊Õ°“√ —Ëß Õπ∑—ÈߺŸâ°√–∑”º‘¥ ·≈–
                                                                            (Òˆ)
                 μ—°‡μ◊Õπª√–™“™π„Àâ‡ÀÁπ‡ªìπμ—«Õ¬à“ß (educational role of tort)

                        °“√ªÑÕß°—π‰¡à„Àâ¡’°“√∑”≈–‡¡‘μπ—ÈπÕ“®‡ªìπ°“√°√–∑”‚¥¬‡©æ“– (specific
                 deterrence) §◊Õ ≈ß‚∑…°“√°√–∑”∫“ߪ√–°“√∑’ˇªìπ¿—¬ À√◊Õ √â“ßÕ—μ√“‡ ’ˬ߿—¬„Àâ Ÿß

                 ¢÷Èπ„π —ߧ¡ À√◊ÕÕ“®®–‡ªìπ°“√ªÑÕß°—π‚¥¬∑—Ë«‰ª (general deterrence) °≈à“«§◊Õ·¡â«à“
                 °“√°√–∑”∫“ߪ√–°“√®–‡ªìπ¿—¬ ·μà°ÆÀ¡“¬‰¡àÀâ“¡‚¥¬μ√ß ·μà°≈—∫„Àâ∑“߇≈◊Õ°

                 (choice) ·°àª√–™“™π«à“®–‡≈◊Õ°∑”À√◊Õ‰¡à ∂â“∑”°ÁμâÕß™¥„™â§à“‡ ’¬À“¬ ‡æ√“–©–π—Èπ
                 General Deterrence §◊Õ §«“¡§‘¥∑’Ë®– √â“ß∑“߇≈◊Õ°„Àâ·°àª√–™“™π«à“®–ª√–æƒμ‘„π

                 ¢Õ∫¢à“¬ À√◊Õ®–¬Õ¡®à“¬‡ß‘π¡“°°«à“ª°μ‘ ¥â«¬‡Àμÿπ’È (general deterrence) ®÷ߙ૬

                 (Òı)
                    §«“¡À¡“¬¢Õß Deterrence ∑’Ë®–°≈à“«μàÕ‰ªπ’ȺŸâ‡¢’¬π„™â§«“¡À¡“¬„ππ—¬∑’Ë„™â‚¥¬∑—Ë«‰ª ´÷ËßÕ“®
                    »÷°…“‰¥â®“°∫∑§«“¡μàÕ‰ªπ’È : Walter Blum and Harry Kalven, The Empty Cabinet
                    of Dr. Calabresi : Auto Accidents and General Deterrence (1967) 34 The University
                    of Chicago Law Review 239; Guido Calabresi.  çFault, Accidents and The

                    Wonderful World of Blum and Kalven,é (1965) 75 Yale Law Journal 216
                 (Òˆ)
                    ª√—™≠“‡¡∏’™“«‡¬Õ√¡—π ™◊ËÕ Immanuel Kant ‡ªìπ§π·√°∑’ˇ πÕ§«“¡§‘¥π’È¢÷Èπ Kant ‡ÀÁπ«à“
                    „π°“√摇§√“–Àå∂÷ߧ«“¡À¡“¬¢Õß°“√„Àâ§à“‡ ’¬À“¬μ“¡·π«§‘¥∑“ߪ√—™≠“∑’ˇ√’¬°«à“
                    Corrective Justice π—Èπ ‡√“μâÕ߇Փª√–‚¬™πå¢Õß¡À“™π ·≈– ‘Ëß·«¥≈âÕ¡„π —ߧ¡‡¢â“¡“
                    æ‘®“√≥“ª√–°Õ∫‡Àμÿº≈¥â«¬ ‡√’¬°«à“ Practical Reason Kant ®÷ß¡Õß«—μ∂ÿª√– ß§å¢Õß°“√„Àâ

                    §à“‡ ’¬À“¬«à“‡ªìπ°“√ —Ëß Õπ ª√–«—μ‘¢Õß Kant ‡ªìπ™’«ª√–«—μ‘¢Õß∫ÿ§§≈∑’ˇ§√àߧ√—¥„π√–‡∫’¬∫«‘π—¬
                    ‡¢“‡ªìπ ¡“™‘°¢Õߢ∫«π°“√Àπ÷Ëß´÷Ëß¡’«‘𗬇§√àߧ√—¥ ‡√’¬°«à“ pietist movement ¢∫«π°“√π’È
                    ª≈Ÿ°Ωíߧπ‡¬Õ√¡—π„Àâ¡’«‘𗬇§√àß·≈–¡’°“√≈ß‚∑…∑’Ë√ÿπ·√ß ‡√’¬°«à“¡’ çpietist spirité : ºŸâ π„®

                    Õ“®»÷°…“μàÕ‰¥â®“°Àπ—ß ◊Õ¢ÕߺŸâ‡¢’¬π, ¥√. √Õßæ≈ ‡®√‘≠æ—π∏å, §”∫√√¬“¬«‘™“π‘쑪√—™≠“,
                    (‡®√‘≠«‘∑¬å°“√æ‘¡æå, ÚıÚ), ∫∑∑’Ë Ú
   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86