Page 85 - Q - 9 - 2
P. 85

54               √«¡º≈ß“π∑“ß«‘™“°“√¢Õß»“ μ√“®“√¬å®‘μμ‘ μ‘ß»¿—∑‘¬å




                        çNow the fault rule, that rule of primitive revenge and aggression

                 can reassert its çmoralé claim as it always will so long as human beings
                              (Ú˜)
                 are humané       ......... (the fault rule... will then be able to resume its
                                                                (Ú¯)
                 original punitive function as......in Soviet law

                         à«π„π°≈ÿà¡‚´‡™’¬≈≈‘ μå·∫∫· °π¥‘‡π‡«’¬ππ—È𠧫“¡§‘¥„π·∫∫¢Õß√— ‡´’¬π—Èπ

                 °Á°”≈—߇√‘Ë¡‡ªìπ∑’Ëπ‘¬¡°—π¡“°¢÷Èπ°«à“‡¥‘¡·μàÕ¬à“߉√°Áμ“¡ §«“¡‡ÀÁπ¢Õßπ—°π‘μ‘»“ μ√å
                 ¬—ß·¬âß°—πÕ¬Ÿà °≈ÿà¡Àπ÷Ëßπ”‚¥¬ Lundstedt ´÷Ëß¡’·π«§‘¥π‘¬¡°“√≈ß‚∑…‚¥¬°“√„Àâ
                           (Ú˘)
                 §à“‡ ’¬À“¬    Õ’°°≈ÿà¡Àπ÷Ëßπ”‚¥¬ Stig Jorgensen ´÷Ëßπ‘¬¡ compensatory idea
                                                 (Û)
                 ∑ƒ…Æ’‡ ’ˬ߿—¬·≈–°“√ª√–°—π —ߧ¡    „πªí®®ÿ∫—𧫓¡‡ÀÁπ¢Õß Stig Jorgensen °”≈—ß
                 ‡ªìπ∑’Ëπ—∫∂◊Õ°—πÕ¬Ÿà ·μà„πÕπ“§μÕ—π„°≈â §«“¡‡ÀÁπ¢Õß Lundstedt Õ“®¡’™—¬„π∑’Ë ÿ¥
                                                                               (ÛÒ)
                 ∂â“Õ—μ√“°“√∑”≈–‡¡‘¥„π· °π¥‘‡π‡«’¬π¡‘‰¥â≈¥≈ߥ—ß∑’˧“¥À¡“¬°—π‰«â

                                                                                     (ÛÒA)
                        „πÕ—ß°ƒ…‡ªìπ∑’ˬÿ쑉¥â«à“ «—μ∂ÿª√– ß§åÕ—πÀπ÷ËߢÕß≈–‡¡‘¥§◊Õ°“√≈ß‚∑…    à«π
                 „πÕ‡¡√‘°“π—È𠧫“¡‡ÀÁπ¢Õßπ—°π‘μ‘»“ μ√å„π‡√◊ËÕßπ’È¢—¥·¬âß°—πÕ¬Ÿà¡“°∂÷ß°—∫¡’°“√¢π“π

                 π“¡¢âÕ¢—¥·¬âßπ’È«à“ Yale-Chicago controversy À√◊Õ Calabresi-Blum & Kalven
                             (ÛÚ)
                 controversy     „π À√—∞π—Èπ·μà‡¥‘¡¬÷¥À≈—°™¥„™â§«“¡‡ ’¬À“¬ (compensatory idea)


                 (Ú˜)
                    Albert Ehrenzweig,  Legal Philosophy From Plato To Freud and After, (A.W.
                    Styhoff Leyden) P. 182 ·≈–¢Õ„À⥟ PP. 183-188
                 (Ú¯)
                    Ibid
                 (Ú˘)
                    Lundstedt, Die Unwissenschaftlichket der Jurisprudenz (1936) vol. 2, P. 1, Williams,
                    The Aim of the Law of Tort (1951) 4 Current Legal Problems 137, 144-151.
                 (Û)
                    Stig Jorgensen, The Decline and Fall of the Law of Torts, (1970) 18 The American
                    Journal of Comparative Law 39.
                 (ÛÒ)
                    Knut Selmer, Interactions Between Insurance and Tort Theories in The Norwegian
                    Law of Personal Injuries. (1970) 18 The American Journal of Comparative Law 145.
                 (ÛÒA)
                      Rookes V. Bernarch (1964) A.C. 1129; Williams, ibid.
                 (ÛÚ)
                    W. Blum and H. Kalven, Public Law Perspectives on a Private Law Problem-Auto
                    Compensation Plans. (1964) 31 The University of Chicago Law Review 641; Guido
                    Cababresi, Fault Accidents and The Wonderful World of Blum and Kalven (1965)

                    75 Yale Law Journal 216.
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90